I wonder why some enterprising lawyer hasn’t filed a class action suit against the various lathe chuck jaw manufacturers on behalf of all the turners that have been injured or suffered damage? I suppose most of the turners simply accept the inferior gripping of the jaws for what it is and when a work piece flies out of the jaws they assume it was unavoidable or perhaps their fault.
When you compare existing jaws to the design of US 8733764 B1 Patent it is obvious that the manufacturers are negligent in not using this design to radically increase their jaw gripping area and safety throughout the range of the chuck to protect their customers. I for one can’t wait to see this design in common usage for obvious reasons.
When you compare existing jaws to the design of US 8733764 B1 Patent it is obvious that the manufacturers are negligent in not using this design to radically increase their jaw gripping area and safety throughout the range of the chuck to protect their customers. I for one can’t wait to see this design in common usage for obvious reasons.
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire